
It is with the images of the recent faculty and student shows at EMU seared into my memory that I must purge my opinion before it causes some irreparable damage to my aesthetic sensibilities. Before I begin just let me say that I have an appreciation for the handling of materials and the techniques employed, it is ultimately the subject matter and tone that I am referring to. That being said, let's explore.
I have no formal training in fine arts, but I do have knowledge of art. It's reasons, resources and influences throughout history. Still I cannot seem to find an appreciation for "art" created after, oh say, 1950. Aside from Warhol and a few other innovative talents I think that artists lately are so caught up in their personal interpretations of how much constipation sucks that artists and critics and historians alike are forgetting the age old question. What is art? Certainly there has to be different levels of art, but it seems that recently anything is allowed on museum and gallery walls.
Obviously this question, what is art?, is probably more of a philosophical one, at least that's what I think. But seriously, to go into a modern art gallery is like looking at the refridgerator door of household with kindergarteners. You can guess at what the colorful abstractness is, but without explanation and a solid understanding of the artist it's just blobs of finger paint.
What ever happened to artists using their work to make statements about politics or religion or social issues or love? They may claim to do that today, but most are comments on levels that, without a novel chained to the wall next to it, would barely be perceivable.
My opinion? (And I know everyone wants to know!)Is that art for arts sake is fabulous.But please people, let us develop some more stringent rules and regulations for what should be seen in public. Or, maybe we should have a gallery called "Constipation Sucks:Personal interpretations That You Won't Get,So Don't Even Bother perusing."
The picture of Xander is not art, although some may argue this fact. The camera caught the moment where the water swells, but isn't splashing. I thought that it was a neat moment captured during bathtime. I certainly wouldn't offer it for public display and criticism, it's just for family and friend enjoyment.




